top of page
Reformix Logo_edited.jpg

Reformix selected to Present at Concrete 2025 on the Industrial Standardisation of Geopolymer Binder Activator Preparation*

  • Sep 7, 2025
  • 2 min read

Updated: Feb 18

Reformix presented work at Concrete 2025 – Concrete Solutions for a Sustainable Future, held in Adelaide from 7–10 September 2025. Our paper, “Optimising Geopolymer Activator Preparation: Thermophysical Insights from a Fly Ash Case Study Towards Process Standardisation” addressed a largely overlooked variable in geopolymer technology: Activator solution preparation.



Challenging the 24-Hour Convention

Many geopolymer studies adopt arbitrary 24-hour activator equilibration periods before mixing. Our thermophysical modelling and calorimetry show this is unnecessary with experimentally validated methods demonstrating that:

  • NaOH(aq) systems reach thermodynamic stability in under 30 seconds.

  • NaOH(s) systems stabilise within approximately 1 minute.


When applied to Western Australian fly ash systems, activator mixing periods can be reduced from 24 hours to a staggeringly low 0.5 hours resulting in:

  • Increased compressive strength by an average of 12.1 ± 3.5 MPa

  • Produced a maximum strength improvement of 28.45 ± 1.1 MPa



Why This Matters

At laboratory scale, 24-hour equilibration is inconvenient, at industrial scale, it is a barrier.

Optimising activator energetics improves:

  • Flowability

  • Wetting behaviour

  • Mixing efficiency

  • Quality control

  • Process scalability

Standardising activator preparation is not a minor procedural refinement, it is a pathway toward industrialising geopolymer systems.


Industry Context

Concrete 2025 made one thing clear = industry is actively pursuing high SCM and alternative binder systems. Several sessions covered high-volume replacement, calcined clays, carbon mineralisation, geopolymer and alkali-activated systems. However, reliability and standardisation remain central concerns. Activators are often treated as a secondary variable. They are not. If activator preparation is inconsistent, binder performance will be inconsistent. Concrete 2025 reinforced that the future of low-carbon concrete depends not only on new materials, but on engineering control of the systems that produce them.


_____________________________________________________

*Citation: R. Skane, E. Jamieson, P. A. Schneider, H. Gildenhuys, J. Allery, X. Sun and W. D. Rickard, “Optimising Geopolymer Activator Preparation: Thermophysical Insights from a Fly Ash Case Study Towards Process Standardisation,” in Concrete 2025: The 32nd Biennial Conference of the Concrete Institute of Australia, Adelaide, 2025.

Comments


bottom of page